nostr:npub1aaq8nmdelgfrcemz9zhakejl38hsgwd2ced60hajkvftxru3jmls0aykwv appreciate you asking tough questions of how pre-nostr EU edicts might affect nostr EU folk.
Now let me push back on your worldview.
“2% inflation is a reasonable buffer”; “risk of deflation” is the standard keynisian dogma taught in fiat schools.
Is it really bad if technology gets cheaper year over year, and the consumer receives more for less?
nostr:npub1aaq8nmdelgfrcemz9zhakejl38hsgwd2ced60hajkvftxru3jmls0aykwv I encourage you to check out nostr:npub1s05p3ha7en49dv8429tkk07nnfa9pcwczkf5x5qrdraqshxdje9sq6eyhe ‘s 📕 The Price of Tomorrow. The fundamental clash is fiat inflationary theft of people’s savings (and therefore time) vs. the benefit of entrepreneurship and tech in providing deflationary goods, services.
Here is Jeff laying out the thesis, and discussing implications. He is a tech veteran, so you should hopefully enjoy:
https://youtu.be/xwQtDPHeCWQ
Thanks for sharing that video. I was going to watch but then realized it was an hour and a half long, which is more time than I care to spend
But I found this book description which I assume summarizes his views
I don't see anything here that supports the conclusion that deflation is desirable
It's true there are shifts in the relative balance between capital and labor, but that has been happening for about 250 years, since the industrial revolution, and so is not qualitatively new
A much more persuasive analysis of the consequences of the shifts of balance between capital and labor is Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century

Thread collapsed