More fair wealth distribution - yes, this is what I hope bitcoin will belp with because of its inconfiscatability and immutability. Just whenever we talk about wealth distribution we need to be careful not to confuse it with any subset of communism and stateism. The bottom line is that there is no such thing as wealth. By wealth we refer to money, monetary value. And money is just a quantifier and proof of society's debt to the money holder. So your wealth equals society's debt to you.

So as long as every person receives money only for the services he personally provides to the society - that is fair. In other words, if someone willingly and not under any mass psyop gave you the money - you are the rightious owner. When somebody does not provide the service, but still receives the money - that is not fair. And this fairness is all we need to worry about. Whether there are very "rich" and cery "poor" people - does not matter. Everyone has what he deserves as long as there is no way to steal, confiscate and counterfate money.

And a way to stay out of mass psyops is to stay away from centralization of anything. I.e. no ownership rights nor any rights whatsoever for legal entities. No ownership of anything for states and companies. Everything must be private, i.e. personal. You can give names for groups of people for simplicity sake, but nothing legal about it.

If the two of us are producing a car, I am producing plastics,and you - metals, then plastics are mine and metals are yours all the time, until we sell it and each get paid directly. Then the entire car is customer's. Seems crazy, but it is possible. And fair.

Then, at least statistically, there will not be much unfairness.