⬇️"the cyber":
well - as i have said, over and over and over and over - these are not great realities for those who suffer access denial for real services. punishing everyone other than the toxic top is evidence it is a rebrand, not a solution. many of these service providers have become predatory and they're being used by crypto hacks to front money laundry and they abuse those who cannot find those services elsewhere. closing them is not the answer - because it causes a shock and actual access for real need fulfilment for these areas evaporates. it is a misguided solution because it punishes citizens not the predatory 3rd party. and by doing it sweepingly, the repercussions will be drastic and long-term. jobs disappear, physical healthcare vanishes, and incentives to build innovative infrastructure vanishes. instead of cutting off the technocrat crypto pools for corporate shills, this effectively emboldens them to simply trash their fronts and retool the scams. this is not a solution. meanwhile, pumping bounty and prison profits, and attacking the low-bar levels of the criminal gang networks, ensures economic paralysis when the jobless market surges and there is no replacement market for them to move into; instead of slowly drawing down luxury brand schemes, building a new market for economic boom (like a high speed rail network across the entire us) slamming the doors and simultaneously denying progressive (of flawed and exploited) goods and services for needy citizens is completely braindead economic policy. you cannot stop the wars or the digital terrorism by allowing predatory corporate pools to rage unchallenged, and crypto shitcoining hedges to exploit their clients/customers.
