There is an assumption that holding a long time horizon results in a better future for the actor. That by factoring in their future state rather than always preferencing their current state, leads to a better now for them in the future.

Many of these high time preference options are facilitated by the fiat system which is essentially stealing from it's participants. By choosing a low time preference option, you are often choosing not to steal from other participants.

The link between time preference & ethics has a lot to do with choosing not to participate in a corrupt system. There is nothing ethical or unethical about choosing to make a fishing rod over catching a fish with your bare hands. It's more ethical to buy a car with money you have saved than to borrow from a lender who creates the currency with an entry in their system.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The assumption about time preference is that it must always be positive. In other words, we assume that people prefer things sooner rather than later, this is why the natural rate of interest cannot be negative.

(sorry about being pedantic about terminology, but that's what Praxeology is all about)