Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar TheGrinder

I don’t really have any use for Cashu. Bitcoin already gives me what I value most, self-custody and trustless settlement.

Some say Cashu is about "trade-offs" and that trusting multiple mints somehow spreads the risk. But that logic misses the point entirely. Bitcoin's breakthrough was that you don’t need to trust anyone. Once you reintroduce trusted intermediaries (even in a "distributed" way) you’ve already stepped off the Bitcoin path.

That’s not decentralisation; that’s just federated trust. It’s the same thinking that gave us Ethereum and its layers of custodial complexity. Systems where you manage risk by trusting more people, not fewer.

Bitcoin isn’t about balancing trust. It’s about removing it.

That’s why many Bitcoiners have no use for Cashu.

Avatar
florian 1mo ago

For me it’s mostly useful for streaming sats and usage in API especially with very low amounts of 1 sat or even less. That’s where lightning has too much overhead.

You pay a service with lightning and while using it, you spend your cashu balance. It’s a very convenient and painless way for developers to add bitcoin/lightning integration by using a mint.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.