Replying to anonymous

There was a lot of problematic stuff going on, but this reflects way more advance planning and malicious intent than was even needed.

For example, pharmaceuticals simply communicated relative effectivity, which was not allowed in communication towards public (or smth like that). I heard about this only months/years(?) later. I think a lot can be explained with opportunists running wild and public being riled up to forget about common sensibilities an human rights.
70
anonymous 8mo ago

Also, I had heard said that the spike proteine was the "obvious best choice" based on the assumption that a race was going on to delivering the vaccine first. Because the spike proteine was a prior selected and already under study element. (Not because it was most favorable candidate for this exact societal situation.) And we have long known (many decades) that pharmaceuticals are notoriously problematic if not kept in check.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

70
anonymous 8mo ago

Also, I wonder, if you consider it a "race" with proper (expert informed) qualification, whether Russia's solution would come out on top, for better choices and methodology and less risk and still timely. Because nobody seems to take an interest in the Sputnik V vaccine. (Well, outside of some scientific research evaluations.)