Replying to Avatar boston wine

Why is it a higher percentage markup to verify a small amount of gold’s authenticity, if small coins are more likely to be legit?

Using nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a's example of a $100 gram coin costing $150 versus a $2000 ounce coin costing $2100…

Is it that the verification process costs around the same regardless of the gold’s weight?

#asknostr

#gold

Combination of factors.

Each unit whether it’s a tiny coin or a bullion bar has to go through multiple assays to confirm legitimacy so you can imagine the same weight in coins will take a lot longer to verify than a single bar - those costs in time/labour add up and get spread across all the units.

But then it’s also a factor of sellers not wanting to deal with small volumes. If you can make $1000 selling one bar or $1 selling one coin (just as an example) then you’re going to spend a lot more time/labour selling enough coins to make up the same profit margin as a single bar sale. It’s almost an “annoyance cost”; they’ll sell it to you but it’s a pain in the arse for them to deal with more customers and make less money so they jack up margins to compensate.

The sweet spot for them is likely those 1/2oz or 1oz coins in terms of unit profits - selling bars would be less frequent but you’d rather make up for that with a few coins than with hundreds.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Thank you, that makes a lot of sense