Nostr Web Client

You didn't answer my two basic questions that would disprove your earlier statement.

Just non-sequitur rambling.

These are rhetorical questions that do not need an answer because they are self-explanatory.

Of course they won't do that and they won't destroy themselves, which is why the climate narrative is so ridiculous, because no matter what Europe does, it will have no effect if China doubles its emissions.

But in your narrative, China and North Korea appear as the saviors of the free world.

That is delusional.

As far as I can tell, in the West you can still criticize your government without going to jail for 20 years.

As far as I know, there are no concentration camps for religious minorities in the West, unlike in China.

Read the cybersecurity and surveillance program that Moscow has in place.

Then you see where the journey goes.

Or do you want to claim that China and North Korea are free countries?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

BUB 2y ago

Again with the non-sequiturs. Why are you talking about North Korea?

My point is keeping with the original point from #[11]. The malthusians which I would argue is just a euphemism for eugenicists want to control everyone through minimizing their access to abundant energy AKA fossil fuels. You piped up that China and Russia are in on it.

These countries are PRO fossil fuels unlike the west.

OΞHI ⚡️🧡 (111k Gang) 2y ago

What the WEF and the BIS want is not what the western population wants - you know that.

You also know that the renewable energy narrative is being pushed by the big oil companies.