I guess next step in evolution of Nostr is zap comments in replies (long press zaps) and Zapdvertisement! That could be fun, I would totally try to advertise something (no idea what yet) just to see how well it works! LFG! ๐Ÿถ๐Ÿพ๐Ÿซก๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ“ข๐Ÿ“ข๐Ÿ“ข

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

And Hanpen leaves the chat at "no idea what yet" ๐Ÿคฃ

๐Ÿถ๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿซ‚

Whatโ€™s a zapvertizement?

#[3]โ€‹ was having an idea to advertise using zaps. Basically the entity allocates a sum of sats and embeds ads into them. Then they autozap (I guess) their target audience. Win win! ๐Ÿถ๐Ÿพ๐Ÿซก

Interesting: that would mean youโ€™d have to know their interests? How would one figure that out? Some sort of ad opt in client?

Analysis of notes. Relays are wide open. We already had friendstr making analysis of people based on that. ๐Ÿถ๐Ÿพ๐Ÿซก

How is it different from the ad model except money going to people? I would personally hate to see forced ads. Maybe opt in would work.

I donโ€™t know ๐Ÿคท, some people might like it, some not. Itโ€™s like having a small text on your paycheck. I probably would not like it, but if they zap large (1K) and have relevant ad, I wouldnโ€™t complain ๐Ÿถ๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ˜‚

No Ty. Keep ads opt in ๐Ÿ™Œ

Thatโ€™s fine too! To each their own! ๐Ÿถ๐Ÿพ๐Ÿซก

You canโ€™t have both unless itโ€™s opt in. Or a client that wonโ€™t support sponsored notes.

Actually, if you run your own zapper, you can filter based on npub. Easy to do! So, if it ever becomes a problem, I have a solution! ๐Ÿถ๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ˜‚

Itโ€™s great for 0.0000001% of people that do that.

Lol! If it comes to that, I got you covered! Worry not! ๐Ÿถ๐Ÿพ๐Ÿซ‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿซก