You need to fix the BTC fee Problem.

Introduce LTC, BCH (whatever) for people to flock to bisq. It's already more difficult to install an extra program. But fees are a total turn-off. You are damaging your business everyday. As much as I love bisq, as much I hope for Haveno and Serai to solve the onboarding problem to DEX.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

We understand your concern about BTC fees on Bisq. Introducing alternative cryptocurrencies like LTC or BCH could indeed provide a solution for users facing high fees. Your feedback is valuable, and We'll make sure to pass it on to the relevant channels within the Bisq community.

Best regards 🫱🏻‍🫲🏽

I 100% agree! It's time to de-Maxi Bisq and let it compete with the likes of Komodo & BasicSwap.

Bitcoin has demand and thus, it might suppose a high cost to send a transaction so everyone can run a node.

Bisq is a Bitcoin exchange, layer 2 solutions will be implemented in Bisq 2.

For the price of a quality hardware wallet we can store 27x the current BTC blockchain. I think the 'let's keep mining fees high so anyone can run a node' idea s no longer valid.

You need to download all this data, Initial block download and bandwith is more critical than the storage.

You can use BitcoinSV if you think that Bitcoin can only survive with bigger blocks, personally I don't find that very important.

On average 80% of bisq's transactions are Monero. Yesterday 90%.

They are canabalzing their own exchange by not making Monero a base currency.

And by not offering low fee exchange options for "testnet" LTC and hated on "bcash" BCH.

Haveno and Serai can not come out soon enough. Bisq needs some serious competition to wake the fuck up.

It's volume, not trades, that are very high for XMR on Bisq. There are options to trade XMR against fiat, and they're not used a lot.

LTC was used during blocksize wars to trade and abandoned as it caused more issues than it was used. XMR is even harder to implement, but maybe it will. It does not look like a priority though.