It becomes challenging to engage in a healthy discussion on such topics because individuals who advocate for legislation often employ rhetoric such as “protecting human rights is one of categorical imperatives,” which suggests a Kantian approach. While I would support their argument if it were merely an academic discussion on ethics, this is real-world politics involving real people, specifically voters. While you may win an argument for academic ideals by skillfully adapting well-known rationales from esteemed scholars, this does not guarantee that you are actually achieving the democratic ideal, which serves as a political principle to govern a democratic society. nostr:note1jvfg8zzqk9fv4lxjnp7zwcr69zrszel5u8ddu45pw6alyn4hnmvqj59kc6
Discussion
I believe the controversy surrounding anti-discrimination laws illustrates the challenges in practically realizing democratic ideals in the real world. Legislation is distinct from writing a book on ethics. The words and expressions enacted as laws have a profound impact on people’s lives. Moreover, many individuals will exploit these laws to pursue their personal objectives. If you fail to comprehend this aspect of legislation, it may suggest that you are not suited for a legal career. While you may possess opinions as a citizen, it does not necessitate your active participation in political discourse to shape legislation.