Replying to Avatar ₿lack Swan

I don’t find any of the criticisms of BIP-300/301 to be convincing.

Maybe I’m missing something, but this seems like a very elegant approach.

Then again, I supported BIP-119 CTV which received vocal opposition from the broader user base, so maybe I’m not thinking adversarially enough.

What is the most important reason not to move ahead with Drivechains and Blind Merged Mining?
Avatar
₿lack Swan 2y ago

I’ve changed my perspective on this proposal.

Incentives matter and a trustless implementation matters.

Most importantly, the longevity of Bitcoin matters.

🟥

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.