"Someone will make money building the gulags, but at least its good people building them."
Discussion
Then we don’t get to complain when companies choose not to accept bitcoin because it’s too risky for them on the legal side. We live in the real world, you know how this stuff works.
If a company's barrier to freedom money is lack of freedom, more compliance will surely set them free.
you wont find me complaining about whether Sears accepts bitcoin.. i will be complaining about what amboss announced today, they can go join the shitty pool with coinbase, etc.
No I wouldn't complain about that. I don't expect that at all. This is the way of the formal economy. Its useless. The informal economy is where freedom lies. Its the only place worth putting in effort to build.
It’s fine if that’s how you want to use it. You won’t get any argument from me. But if bitcoin doesn’t have representation in the formal economy, shitcoins will have no problem filling the void.
Shitcoins have been filling the void for years.
Ha, the formal economy going bankrupt from scams because they can't adapt is fitting.
Anyway I gave a more nuanced response regarding incrementalism, but full compliance not attempting to change anything, but just get Bitcoin to fit for these people I don't care for, is not interesting to say the least and the services built around that usecase are simply not useful for me and so I would prune that from my feed best I could.
Oh and to say the most rather than the least, its unacceptable.