I agree with you generally; in this specific instance, however, the logical right of a creator over his artifacts applies.

In a strong sense, this is market driven; we humans are the brilliant, self-replicating design, visible to all the universe. I'm unaware of any more profound, impressive invention; can you point to one?πŸ€”πŸ§πŸ˜ƒ

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Not if we assume humans have a creator.

My assessment of the evidence--i.e. observation of the human machine--even discounting all religious texts and beliefs, which I openly acknowledge--overwhelming persuades me that the human body could not remotely possibly exist absent an utterly brilliant designer.

That’s fair enough! Are you open to the idea of autonomous manifestation via conciousness / soul absent a singular designer? Lets call it life force for the lack of a better word. I am wary of the notion of central design due to near infinite variables piecing together something so complex.

I am an inventor and designer myself. I'm not a force or a flow. I have a very hard time conceiving of something as generic as a "life force" having the intelligence and ability to plan that the human body design obviously (to me, thinking as a designer) requires.

Who even knows ? Tell me that

Yes, it is difficult to explain the unexplainable. That's why many are drawn to easy solutions like a singular creator. That is something we, especially as creatives, can understand. However, we cannot know for sure, which is why I won't draw any conclusions. In the end, I don't need to or even want to know. It makes no difference in my life if I live inside a simulation or am a part of some collective consciousness experiencing a snapshot of an oscillating life force.

Ditto.