Nostr Web Client

If you consider that Ashton is a psyop, it’s not inconceivable that some « damning evidence » have been planted to support the psyop. I have seen enough of them to realize how sophisticated they can be.

Regarding the explosion, I know that Ashton says it’s not a match but honestly I don’t see how this match can be due to chance. That’s one of this case where your belief on the case will alter your perception one way or the other but I think that if your were to ask random people whether or not the two images match (outside of the context of the #MH370), most of them will they it does.

Also, when I hear the guy who took the picture versus #AshtonForbes, there is no doubt in my mind who’s the one pushing a narrative. Maybe the photographer is a fed and great actor but highly doubt it whereas Ashton displays a lot patterns of someone gaslighting his audience. He’s been pretty successful at it that’s for sure but he won’t fool everybody.

Sovereign Being 7mo ago

Well, seeing as some of the people trying to debunk the footage have been exposed as frauds who are lying... what are the odds that there are honest people trying to do a debunk? So far, the only liars have been on one side of this story.

It's not just Ashton saying it's not a match. The match is achieved on ONE frame of the animation AFTER applying multiple effects.

Anyone suggesting the footage is a match has been duped. The alleged explosion animation has been used in films and video games, but it's never been altered. I would agree if the animation was a complete match for the duration. But it's not even close, it's a single frame and it needs to be manipulated for an approximate match on the single frame. So why doesn't the rest of the animation match? Come on, be honest and explain that.

https://youtu.be/vtHCCgIw3tc

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

LogicallyMinded 7mo ago

As I said previously, I’m not as interested in the arguments related to video editing because I don’t have the expertise and time to assess the claims being made but when I go back to this clouds picture, I still don’t see a debunking of it besides calling the photographer and KimDotCom feds. And again, because I have good reasons to believe that Ashton is disingenuous on this point (has he ever tried to debunk that the picture wasn’t available on cgtextures.com?), that’s enough for me to draw the conclusion that Ashton is the actor of a psyop. Ashton doesn’t act as a researcher since he avoid/ignore some piece of evidences contradicting his narrative. I smell propaganda and not truth seeking when I look at his positions. Obviously, we won’t agree here.

Sovereign Being 7mo ago

Yeah, that's clear.

The cloud images don't exist anywhere online prior to October 2014. Not sure what other evidence could be required.

I do have expertise in video editing and compositing, and I'm telling you that regardless of the clouds and explosion, the timeline of the video makes it impossible to have been faked, and I'm willing to put money against that claim for anyone who wants to make the video from scratch.

Your only saving grace is the clouds, while you ignoring the mountain of evidence opposing that claim.

LogicallyMinded 7mo ago

The API screenshot doesn’t prove that the picture was online before 2014. That’s the interpretation made of a data with no digital chain of custody.

LogicallyMinded 7mo ago

That said, I understand that all of these can be convincing elements if you haven’t seen the interview of the photographer.

https://old.bitchute.com/video/ZiX3FoXJeAxD/