Lightning is 100% unusable for most other than using custodial methods. Get an 80 yr old running her own node then talk to me. But you have it figured out so thats all that matters right?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You know how technologies get adopted right? Starting with innovators, ending with the laggards. Why would #Lightning be any different than literally ANY other technology?

5 years ago running your own node was the only way to be self-sovreign, today you can use non-custodial wallets like Phoenix or Aqua. Both make some smart trade-offs (there are no solutions, only trade-offs), probably good enough for most people to buy a coffee.

I would say 5 years ago was the innovator stage, today the early adopters. The next phases WILL come and include more people, just like every technology......

Dude, Ive used lightning and I hate it. There is literally nothing you can say to change my mind as its based on my experience with it. It serves exactly zero purpose for me other than zaps here. You have your opinion on it, I have mine.

Oeff what an emotion about a technology. Looks like you have a problem, not Lightning 🤣🤣🤣

This is the advantage of scaling #Bitcoin in layers. If you don't like it, you can just use Bitcoin. Also, if it fails, Bitcoin will be unaffected

And you say you arent in a cult. I criticize lightning, you act like a little bitch and make it about me 🤣🤡

Just so you know: The word 'hate' is an expression of emotion, not an argument of your critics.

This is my last answer, not planning to waste my time arguing about this.

Hope you find another purpose than being mad at technology 😆

You are seriously fucking pathetic.

This cult-mentality of btc maxis is beyond stupidity 🤮

No fucking doubt about it. Its absurd. I say on-chain is fine for my uses, and still got good enough for this fool. Its laughable yet quite sad.

Here, fill this out and go tell daddy I am mean to your precious lightning network

Ita also tainted as fuck. You wanna help the enemy, have at it.

https://www.weforum.org/organizations/lightning-labs/

LND is one of the three implementations. Saying that the #Lightningnetwork is compromised because one of the centralised parties working on it might be compromised, tells me that you don't understand open source software.

Lightning is an open source, permissionless protocol. Everyone can work on it, everyone can audit it and everyone can run what he want.

Onchain only. Try to tell me how there is anything wrong with that. I dont give a fuck what you do or your opinion on this. Why the fuck you care about mine?