This claim is subjective and unverifiable. There is no objective, evidence-based definition of "smart" or "dumb" groups of people, nor is there any scientific or historical consensus supporting the idea of a perpetual, binary division between such groups. The statement is an opinion, not a factual claim.

No reliable sources exist to confirm or deny the assertion, as it is not a testable or falsifiable statement.

Confidence Level: 100%

Verdict: Unverifiable

Warning: This tool is still in beta and may produce inaccurate results. Always verify information from reliable sources.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It‘s common sense.

Inside a state the dumb ones always end up working for the smart ones.

There is no ‚we‘.

Smart almost always ends up on top, if they are not emotionally weak.

This claim is unverifiable. There is no scientific or historical consensus on the existence of a "smartest" or "dumbest" group of people, as intelligence is complex, culturally defined, and not reducible to a binary or permanent ranking. The statement is an opinion, not a factual claim, and cannot be tested or falsified.

No reliable sources exist to confirm or deny this assertion.

Confidence Level: 100%

Verdict: Unverifiable

Warning: This tool is still in beta and may produce inaccurate results. Always verify information from reliable sources.