Thanks. Having a listen now.

get that woman on #nostr !

cw should be able to produce his keys or reproduce his keys - and he should be able to prove what's in the genesis block. his associates are his influencers. the end goal is 2 fold: to doxx satoshi and to force satoshi to relinquish custody through a bankrupting legal battle.

it's that simple.

https://twitter.com/the_valley1005/status/1569399722372386816?s=46&t=dNCvJf_QusLEvYoKccEtgA

Gonna brutal on her only because I care about the case so much. She is naive and doesn't understand the UK legal system.

1. She stresses MIT license. Way too much. Please refer to Thornton Vs Shoe Lane Parking Ltd.

2. The explanation of open source is glossed over. I have an explanation. I will post below.

3. She doesn't see the most obvious example of different chains/versions. I will explain below:

1a. One cannot just make a contract the way one wishes. However we must note that there can be no contract without consideration. The US legal system has to a large extent become codified and judges are not as philosophical, they're robotic. In the UK judges spend a lot more time waxing philosophical. I know because I dropped in on many lectures on jurisprudence by renowned scholars at UCL. I get the distinct, quite frankly off-putting feeling that she is looking down upon the system of law in the UK. This will not go down well with any judge. As American law is just a bastardized, watered down, dumbed down, crap derivative of English Common Law. Even the closing remarks are "In the US... freedom of speech blah blah blah." 😠 😡 " Piss off you Yankee retard" is what most Judges and Barristers will be thinking. I know as I spent many hours with a good friend of mine who is a Barrister in the Lamb Chambers.

2a. Explain open source as a multi-author anthology of poems that anyone can contribute to, edit and publish. The most popular edition gets adopted by the most people.

3a. Look into British history and have a look at the many different versions of the Bible. What Craig essentially wants the court to do is dictate that everyone in the whole world must use the King James version. He may as well just write his own version and hope that everyone else follows his version.

Thanks.