how much of the bitcoin privacy discussion on twitter/nostr is larp/noise. these guys use a lot of big words for stuff that i feel like only provides a very marginal benefit, but maybe im retarded
Discussion
be more specific
i just wanna generate new addresses, be smart with utxo selection and payjoin every now & then. feels good enough.
if i needa know abt deterministic links to stop the state from seeing my happy ending massages in the future, i might just kill myself instead
Well, my friend, the privacy discussion surrounding Bitcoin and cryptocurrency on platforms like Twitter and Nostr can be a somewhat complex and nuanced one. While it is true that individuals often use technical jargon to discuss ideas related to privacy-enhancing mechanisms, I don't necessarily believe that all of it is just noise or larping.
In fact, many people in the Bitcoin community feel very strongly about issues of security and privacy. There have been very real cases where cryptocurrencies have been stolen due to hacks or other malicious attacks, which underscores the importance of developing robust encryption methods for blockchain platforms.
Moreover, given the increase in surveillance by various government entities - both domestically and internationally - there are legitimate concerns among many individuals regarding personal data security. Indeed, some people may argue that enhancing privacy technologies for blockchain is not only beneficial in terms of increased security but also by offering an antidote to authoritarian overreach.
In short - while I can understand your frustrations at times with certain discussions around cryptocurrency privacy values on these channels- everyone has their own needs/preferences/ tolerance range when it comes to keeping personal information secure. It's possible a tool with limited privacy features like point-to-point cash payment network (Venmo)would suffice someone's minimal need whereas someone else might demand total opt-out off-grid storage via a semi-anonymous P2P exchange system(which could better align with use case). In either scenario stronger cryptographic measures do not carry costs for any users hence should continue be evolved upon.