He’s absolutely free (and welcome) to share his thoughts and we’re free to push back.

Always good to temper one’s expectations, especially when it comes to heroes in the Bitcoin space.

I’d argue that Saylor absolutely is a part of Bitcoin. And I agree 100% when you say we are all Bitcoin. In fact:

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/takes/frank-we-are-bitcoin

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

But, maybe, just maybe, even forces against Bitcoin are part of Bitcoin? They are shaping Bitcoin trying to push it in that or other direction while pro-Bitcoin forces which are not united are opposing and trying to push the other directions. It’s like crowd rolling big ball on the beach.

I would say that Bitcoin is not only for enemies but also for enemies of Bitcoin.

I still bet this ball is rolling the right direction.

✌️

I don’t think it’s a matter of “good” and “evil”. It’s more about everyone with a stake in Bitcoin speaking up to add to the narrative around it and to move the protocol in the direction they see fit. And you’re right, Bitcoin is for enemies, though, I’d prefer not to think in such a black and white way about Saylor. I think he’s also done some good for Bitcoin.

I don’t treat Saylor as enemy of Bitcoin either. It was general statement. Saylor is in ny opinion proBitcoin, positive force although hus view differs from mine.

I view this pretty the same way, though, I’d take the word “positive” out of that statement.

😎