Yes. People could be willing to zap v4v on new up and coming artists, and then expect solid quality from subscription. Advertisement will always pay for media junk food. Everyone eats that shit, nobody wants to pay for it.
Make so that the protocol can accommodate all distribution models and leaves to the actors the right to set and accept conditions. Then, let healthy competition do its job.
The most honest answer when thinking about all this is: fuck knows
But how cool is it, that we have the option now to add V4V in a proper way? I would call it: Fuck yeah!
I think street performers is what we have now that most looks like zap fuel v4v.
TIL that the average yearly income for street performers in the US is 45k
🤔
Median income would be a better metric but still interesting. How much of that is via booked gigs though. I bet they draw income from a mix as well.
I always believed that in the music industry concerts should make the most profit and not streamings. Selling physical records was always overprized, because you had the record labels in between. Digital records now making the V4V model available and concerts are the main income. I think there is no black and white right now
