Well, it's a real problem in KYC apps; I imagine it would be worse with no algorithm and no safety mechanisms.

Can't say I'm part of any of that though, that was kinda random

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It’s fine. Keep telling yourself that you’re helping women by labelling all men looking for a parter and who are frustrated with the commercialisation and karenisation of that as rapists

Looking for a partner alone on the internet is a problem. Communities are important. Keep telling yourself you're helping women build strong families with a zero-risk swipe.

You just argued against location transparency for safety, but now you’re saying the problem is people not being present in the community. So which is it? Because I was literally arguing against the ‘zero-risk swipe’ model from the beginning. If you actually engaged with what I said instead of reacting to buzzwords you’d realize that.

Another reason trying to meet women through ‘community events’ is that there are heaps of passive aggressive dumbasses like you there that need ‘community engagement’ as a cover for trying to meet women.

Okay. While we're projecting character traits, I don't think you understamd how to meet a person through an introduction or your social network, which isnwhy your head is around engagent and apps. You're telling me I'm the problem; dismissing the actual harms when I call them out.

HFS alone.

So now you’re saying that not only are people who want functional dating apps ‘rapey’, but anyone who wants a better dating app also can’t meet people any other way. Ridiculousness

Maybe I just credit women with enough wear withal to broadcast their relationship status, approximate location and last seen and you know, not be raped? Maybe it’s an Australian thing? What country are you in?

EU. You say these things as if current apps don't have these "safety" features, and as if women are themselves at fault for getting assaulted by strangers. Seriously GFY. You're dying on a really shitty hill here.