Your replies are full of shit, have zero intellectual depth, don’t even match your ideological portrayal of “Alan Watts” and are supposed to pass judgement on something as serious as the state adopting Bitcoin despite having zero rigour behind it.
You’ve been found out here.
You're right that he is failing to engage with your argument. But you are also overreacting and engaging in attacks on his presentation that are probably not relevant and definitely not helpful toward getting him to engage in the real argument you made originally.
That’s fine, I’m just pointing out the irony of how close-minded “Alan Watts” is.
Like if that’s who you’re going to style yourself after
1) don’t be a complete statist cuck -and-
2) actually have an open mind
Agreed but I don't think he's being a statist, just failing to really listen and have an open mind on this one point, to our points of view.
