Digital #Plebs in the Internet's Feudal Age: The Unsettling Parallels of #Nostr

How a Decentralized Protocol is Reinventing Medieval Hierarchies in the Digital Era

#Nostr, an acronym for "Notes and Other Stuff Transmitted by Relays", has emerged as a decentralized protocol for content publishing, promising censorship resistance and freedom from centralized server tyranny. Yet a closer look at its structure reveals a striking analogy with medieval feudalism, flavored with Roman-era rhetoric. Users are often called "plebs", evoking ancient Rome’s rigid social hierarchy. But how can a modern protocol mirror a 9th-century socio-political system? The answer lies in the "relays"—the nodes transmitting messages. Each #relay operates like an autonomous fiefdom: it sets its own rules, filters content, and decides who gains access. Users—the #plebs—must choose which relay to pledge allegiance to for communication. There’s no central authority, just a constellation of digital overlords offering protection in exchange for loyalty. Plebs can migrate between relays, but they remain tenants on another’s land, bound by local laws. Those controlling a relay, like medieval barons, wield power to exile or silence users. The difference? Instead of castles and wheat fields, we have servers and algorithms. And while Roman plebs fought for civil rights, digital plebs battle for free speech—often finding themselves exiled to a neighboring fiefdom. Nostr’s decentralized utopia thus resembles a mosaic of micro-dictatorships more than a horizontal democracy. Censorship resistance morphs into dependence on relay operators’ benevolence—the new sovereigns of a digital Middle Ages where each fief is a sovereign realm. #Plebs navigate this fragmented landscape hoping to find a liberal haven, yet they remain subjects, never citizens.

#bitcoin #nostr #lightning #zap #ai #pleb #algorithm