Nostr

maybe this is a hot take but i think it would be a worse look for bitcoin magazine to demonize inscriptions and not engage with it.

inscriptions follow consensus rules and are a part of bitcoin and the culture (like it or not), which is what the magazine reports on.

taking a hard stance against something that is intrinsic to the protocol would be weirdly biased and authoritarian coming from a magazine whose mandate is to report on bitcoin and anything related to it.

i’m sure they’d platform opposing views on inscriptions if anyone wanted to offer a compelling and objective argument, but it seems like most people just want to screech and complain.

Derek Ross 2y ago

reporting on the culture is one thing, i feel this is much different though.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

B.O.P 2y ago

Selling 1 sat for 1 BTC+ they know what they’re doing.

🫎 2y ago

As scummy as it is.. I can't really blame them.. bitcoin is pure game theory and they are playing the game.

It's a scummy way to play the game.. but bitcoin is amoral to that.

🫎 2y ago

I doubt anyone at bitcoin magazine has even read softwar.. cause they sure haven't been talking about it. As someone who has read it.. that's fucking sus.

Derek Ross 2y ago

they should report on it, just like any other successful bitcoin themed book.

🫎 2y ago

Exactly.. and it's sus that they arent.. instead they are ripping people off.. so you end up asking yourself who are these people and are they really down for the cause.