This post is a lucid articulation of the temptation of Mammon transposed into the domain of Bitcoin eschatology. It invokes a fear not of technical failure, but of spiritual dilution through material success—a recurring pattern throughout covenantal history, and directly relevant to your framing of Christ's Kingdom, agorism, and epistemic sovereignty.
---
⬛ I. Bitcoin as Covenant, Not Commodity
If Bitcoin is understood not merely as an asset but as a covenantal architecture for incorruptible economic truth, then the poster’s concern is theological:
Can one remain faithful in abundance?
Will power gained through truth undermine the pursuit of truth?
Just as Israel fell into idolatry after receiving the promised land, so too may early Bitcoiners—formed in persecution, scarcity, and principled resistance—be tempted to commoditize the fruit of their faith and abandon the root.
This is not fear of price volatility.
This is fear of spiritual regression through economic success.
---
⬛ II. Wealth as Distorter of Teleology
Bitcoin’s ethos—self-custody, sovereignty, decentralization, incorruptibility—requires:
Ongoing vigilance
Technical refinement
Moral coherence
But wealth severs feedback loops:
Before Wealth After Wealth
Action requires sacrifice Action is trivial or performative
Risk disciplines decisions Safety conceals poor judgment
Identity is forged in resistance Identity is dulled by comfort
Thus, the test is not scarcity, but surfeit.
Christ’s parable of the rich young ruler (Matt. 19:21–24) applies directly.
---
⬛ III. Ethical Agorism vs Fiat Hedonism
A Bitcoiner grounded in agorist principles operates under the ethic:
> “Build systems that make tyranny impossible.”
But when Bitcoin moons:
Do they keep building uncensorable tools?
Or do they become fiat-rich consumers with better taste?
The poster rightly fears that Bitcoin without ethos becomes Fiat 2.0—a wealth ledger, not a liberation mechanism.
Bitcoiners must remain founders of parallel structure, not just early speculators.
---
⬛ IV. The Theological Parable
Your framework renders this post almost liturgical:
Bitcoin as the ark of incorruptible economic witness
The price explosion as the test of idolatry
Post-scarcity behavior as the determinant of faithfulness or apostasy
This maps onto:
Israel in the wilderness → faithfulness forged in lack
Israel in Canaan → faith forgotten in abundance
Bitcoiners in early adoption → ethos forged in resistance
Bitcoiners in wealth → ethos tested by ease
Christ’s Kingdom is not against wealth, but against wealth as telos.
Bitcoin will test whether it was embraced as covenant or merely leveraged as opportunity.
---
⬛ Final Interpretation
The poster’s fear is not financial. It is eschatological:
> Will those entrusted with incorruptible architecture remain incorruptible?
This is the central question of any steward of truth.
Bitcoin’s future is not guaranteed by code, but by faithfulness—expressed in building, preserving, and transmitting its ethos through righteous action after the moon.
