How an entity uses the energy it generates / pays for shouldn’t even be a public debate. Doesn’t matter if it’s bitcoin mining, cars or hair dryers.

The coining of the term „Environmental Terrorism“ is not as far away as you might think. Why do you think the whole energy debate is picking up pace since last year? Why destabilize grids on purpose now?

It’s just like how people were easily stigmatized if they didn’t take the vaxx by letting personal medical information and bodily autonomy become a public debate. The only reason needed was a „public health crisis“. Next is the „energy crisis“.

CBDCs will be used to control the people trapped in the system and the environmentalist social pressure will be used to control the sovereign people who try to escape with Bitcoin.

Everything is carefully put into place for that move. It’s the perfect complement for total control, combined with a CBDC, enforced by social pressure.

Will anonymizing your coins by coinjoining help you keep your sovereignty? Only if you never let anyone know that you are in possession of bitcoin. Chances are, almost every bitcoiner, even if they never told any person, left some traces of interaction with Bitcoin linked to their identity.

If we all think Bitcoin is the threat to the current system we think it is, we should reject the environmentalist frame at all cost.