Interestingly, the same people who were happy when Bitcoin was attacked by spammers and shitcoiners and transactions were at 2000 sat/vB are the same ones who are now celebrating transactions below 1 sat/vB.

These are people who mock Bitcoin and want it to be used for something it is not, distracting attention from the real issue. Who knows if they have the support of intelligence services, as Fakesatoshi did. The problem is that they have now captured the Core team, although it was not very difficult since consensus has never existed. For consensus to exist, we need several clients compatible with the protocol, not just one.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpl8hpfzul2qha25p8wd63gm46ufax95lfgnl8h9v84y3zt0k05m7qqsqrvw8gljwxku57syfqurnp2jmp2efrjdu85j8evc9ykznapqq4ns5fs3hz

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Is it a little easier on side chains? Sure. But the core (haha) idea seems to be that the limit encourages mining centralization without any tangible benefits. I don't care whether you get pwned by a supply chain attack or not. Honestly I love that you're so GFY on this: the world needs more of that independent spirit. Take care of yourself