Alternative viewpoints of covid were more nuanced. They accounted for individual experiences, preferences, and situations. They called for tailored risk assessments and countermeasures, and following evidence over ideology, just as any responsible practitioner should. They never made the unhealthy presumption of omnipresent sickness, nor perpetual helplessness. They simply stuck to the time-tested, ethical premise that every one of us should be empowered to make our own free and informed decisions. 
It can be difficult to separate fact from fiction, especially in our highly polarized world. Whether information comes from the extreme left or far right, from partisan fact-checkers or fact-bending provocateurs, bias confirmation rules the day. Those who honestly seek truth know that it likely lies somewhere in between, but finding it requires an open mind, critical thinking, and a willingness to challenge preconceived notions.
https://twitter.com/jayberjay/status/1473695236174004231
With +275 unique links to source material for every statistic, quote, document, study, testimony, and report, Stick A Fork In It provides food for thought on the many logical inconsistencies plaguing the story we were sold about covid, empowering YOU to separate fact from fiction… No trust required.
#BBQRebellion 🍁✌️
https://jayberjay.substack.com/p/stick-a-fork-in-it
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
