What was the misinformation?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

For one his voter fraud claims were a bit above and beyond so to speak. Same with immigration.

Facts were there but they refused to utilize them and went for audience capture. MSNBC does the same thing, as well as many others, so wasn’t just him.

So he’s no more or less a source of misinfo than any talking head on entertainment news? That’s fair.

Depends on the story/coverage but more or less I wouldn’t fight you too much there 🤝

The vitriol with which he came after some things that I deeply care about as a progressive was infuriating, but that is in itself separate and doesn’t constitute misinformation, I’ll make that clear.

I appreciate that. It’s good to take the temp down. I hate every word out of Maddow’s mouth, but I won’t accuse her of being dangerous to democracy or a peddler of misinfo or anything. She’s just a dumb bitch I don’t like lol and it’s her right to be that.

For sure. Not trying to peddle the progressive stereotype anymore (I try to be careful in my word choice but here i let my guard down a bit more “amongst friends”) Yeah I wouldn’t use the label “dangerous for democracy” on media (other folks/institutions, yes). People need to think for themselves. I hate all of it/this media game.

It’s really the authoritarians we all should be cancelling. America is about being seperate but equal. Which means leaving each other alone.

Leaving each other alone and supporting everyone’s freedom under the law to do and be what they want. Yup!

"a bit above and beyond" how damning of an accusation. Absolutely no substance with you weak minded progressives.

I wonder do you think Tucker Carlson was dangerous to democracy?