People willing to pay for a privacy service with a privacy koin. Wow I am impressed 😂😂
A small VPN service isn’t representative of economic activity. Cling to your delusions but monero is and will remain economically irrelevant.
Discussion
deliberately ignoring coincards to go in with your retard babble, I see :^)
Dark web fentanyl dealers need to wash their filthy xmr somehow :)
I’ll let you know when someone mentions monero to me in the world. Might be a couple decades.
In the meantime, if you’d like to make a purchase from me, I am Bitcoin only.
Every arrest because of Monero has usually been because they were swapping out of Monero, and into Bitcoin and using custodial services to pay them.
This wouldn't happen if the people used KYC services but it's generally hard to put illicit gains back into the system, Bitcoin, Monero, or fiat, etc.
P2P markets for buying/selling Bitcoin/Monero I meant to say.
I’m talking about the use of monero on coincards. It’s just people who are washing their dirty money into something useable.
I don't see that as any different than Bitrefill.
Obviously Bitcoin, and Monero aren't as easily spendable in fiat land yet unfortunately.
The goal should be to make both as spendable as possible.
But even if we assume 100% become BTC only for crypto then monero would just use swapping services instead to spend.
I could spend Monero, and you get bitcoin, and you wouldn't know it unless you used an advanced AML system that tracks swapping services.
And let's assume if the global economy was 100% Bitcoinized then some malicious people would see others balances unless merchants used 3rd party custody, or advanced obfuscation methods like coinjoins, payjoins, or whirlpools, etc. But those who didn't would be attacked if they had large BTC amounts.
This would become common enough where people would begin to save in privacy assets instead to protect themselves.
definitely not interested in being a customer after your behavior in this thread.
your attitude is exactly the same as a nocoiner circa 2016
"only druggies use Bitcoin, let me know when some legit service is taking it" 🙄
shitting on something, but not on the merits, just on association and propaganda.
cool cool
>only criminals use monero
>sells cannabis, which is still illegal at the federal level, while accepting blockstream coin for it
topkek
Fentanyl / meth / opioids ≠cannabis but wouldn’t expect you to understand.
I really don’t care to tell others they can’t sell or consume any substance. But I personally would never respect or have any association with someone who sold drugs of death. I find them abhorrent as human beings.
Good thing I'm here to do all the judging then. Others shouldn't sell or consume fentanyl, meth, opioids, or cannabis. People should live an authentic life, and people should make their living producing something that doesn't have to interfere with people's internal signaling before it will appear valuable to anyone.
I don't give a shit about whether a drug harms someone's health and neither should anyone else. Fentanyl, meth, opiods, and cannabis would all be bad even if they didn't have any adverse long term health effects. The problem is the direct short term affects.
I said I don’t care to tell them what to do. I am judging them and said I don’t want to be around people who do that. But in the end, it’s everyone’s personal choice to decide.
Okay, so you judge meth users. So what? Do you judge people for using the cannabis you sell to them?
Not at all because cannabis at worst is harmless and at best, medicinal.
Meth, opioids and drugs like fentanyl destroy the human body and mind and make users dangerous. Cannabis doesn’t do that. If you can’t tell the difference then I don’t trust your judgement.
Do you really not get it? I don't give a shit about whether a drug destroys the human body or how people act while on the drug. Fentanyl, meth, and opiods would all be bad even if they didn't have any adverse long term effects on the human body or mind and even if people taking these drugs were perfectly well adjusted while under the influence.
Cannabis is an exogenous ligand thqt interferes with the human body's internal signaling mechanisms. Cannabis isn't sustainance and it bypasses human sensory organs to manipulate people from the inside. The effects that cannabis has on us are shallow, inauthentic, and meaningless.
Try me!
Thanks for your opinions.
It's my pleasure. I appreciate you sharing your beliefs as well. Just so nobody gets confused though, my beliefs aren't just opinions since I am willing and able to provide justification for them. I'm interested to hear if you have a response to my criticism of your cannabis selling, but if you are tired then I understand if you want to call it quits for now.
bro... cannabis is definitely harmful. it can be medicinal, too... but don't get it twisted. the whole argument that you can't kill somebody with THC could very well be accurate, but that doesn't mean it's harmless by any means. This is why you feel that giving your product to 5 year olds would be a bad idea.
i say this as somebody who uses it, and plenty of other substances.