Spam is not some esoteric difficult-to-define thing. It's about as dumb as the "what is a woman" argument and has the same energy.
Discussion
LGBTQ+SPAM
“Not difficult to define” … never defines.
its difficult to define but it isn't difficult to see what should actually be done.
It shouldn’t be difficult to define, unless they have other motivations. I consulted the all knowing Satoshi Nakamoto and his writings of old. (The white paper)
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
Satoshi Nakamoto
satoshin@gmx.com
www.bitcoin.org
Abstract. A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online
payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a
financial institution.
Title, subject, and predicate all point to one thing. Not….
#mynodemychoice
#yournodeyourchoice
#bitcoin
I think that sometimes spam is confused with something else that is not always and necessarily spam 🤷♂️
Spam is a delicious tinned meat product.
Expanding Bitcoin's Layer 1 uses beyond a peer-to-peer cash system undermines its security and risks transforming it into a less valuable asset.
Such proposals are either based on genuine maliciousness or driven by greed with no bad intentions.
Spam is anything other than the data required for Bitcoin to function as a peer-to-peer cash system.