You would be the one signing the transaction on the way out. You have custody at that point, right?
Or we just talking about another collaborative service?
Discussion
No, I'm asking you who with a pool of capital, who has unlimited opportunities to put that capita to work, would chose to underwrite risk of an unknkown person. Don't think about it from your shoes for a moment, think about it from the person who'd be paying the guarantee.
Wouldn’t you hold your own insurance against the coins in your custody?
If you fuck up, you make a claim against your policy and make your customer whole.
In terms of KYC, what about knowing my name, email, phone, address etc. makes me risk assessable?
I’m going to assume it means they can hold you accountable via the legal system in the event of fraud