With answers it could provide some path to more complicated topics but with code it won’t even try.

I used to get it to spit out some advanced JavaScript to do all sorts of 3js things and now it falls back to “well, that’s complicated”

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yeah, it should definitely provide more paths to get a more comprehensive answer. One thing I like about Bing and Google bard is that they point you to the resources. It's constantly changing tho, that's true.

I just tested, you are correct. It provides better code only when you explicitly instruct it on how to create a function in pseudocode. That's dumb and backwards.

My guess is this stuff will be segmented and sold separately to different audiences. Developers will get a developer tuned model that probably costs more than the generic version and will do a better job at interpreting dev tasks.

But who knows, maybe I’m wrong.

I mean, that makes sense. Developers are definitely the power users, and they may also offer some more developer-specific tools for that plan.