I literally said it in the 1st post you replied to
and what Im saying is EXTREME clear-cut.
so far all youve said is
"hww more secure against theoretical attacks nobody has ever heard of"
which is true.
just saying for your average pleb it doesnt matter.
Very short sided man. Security matters for everyone.
The founder of Trezor started HWW’s because his coin was hacked. You apparently think people using graphene is an equal recommendation to a hardware wallet and you’re wrong. Sorry, I know it’s not fun to hear 🤷🏻♂️
These attacks aren’t theoretical. Cybersec professionals are building tools to stop very real possibilities to help people like you secure generational wealth and you’re dismissing their work as unnecessary.
I love graphene devices as much as anyone. But they are designed for general purpose privacy. Not long term savings. No computers are designed for such a purpose, which is why the hww industry now exists.
Maybe the real problem here is using the term cold storage. It means something specific and you’re using it to describe a suitable setup for yourself, but it’s not the same. It’s certainly not easy to use cold storage for the average person.
Nothing wrong with using hot wallets. I use them too. But “cold storage” should never be a smartphone-diy recommendation.
I think this is as clearly as I can make my point. So I’m moving on with my Saturday, good luck man.
Im fine if we dont call it "cold storage". i dont particularly care if we call it that or not.
ill also close by pointing out you have not indicated any security vulnerabilities in my suggestion.
although i agree with your point its more vulnerable to 1 in a million type attacks that average plebs are extremely unlikely to be targets for.
https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=Pixel+graphene+cve+vulnerability+history
Graphene is best around. But nobody is invincible.
agreed 👍
