Replying to Avatar τέχνη

Have you thought about incorporating NIP-32 for part where there are multiple articles about the same subject?

That is the one I was planning to use for movie reviews for example (many reviews referencing the same movie).

Just need a standard format for the link. I would imagine something using a schema.org definition?
Avatar
τέχνη 1y ago

CC nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
hodlbod 1y ago

Maybe `d` tags would be enough here. If two articles have the same slug they're on the same topic. nostr:nprofile1qyghwumn8ghj7vf5xqhxvdm69e5k7tcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyd8wumn8ghj7urewfsk66ty9enxjct5dfskvtnrdakj7qpql2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afq42ec4h do you have any idea how "disambiguation" pages would work?

Avatar
PABLOF7z 1y ago

Yeah, the d tag is what is reviewed normalized (lowercase, s/ -/) so no need to pull in any schema.org craziness

Avatar
τέχνη 1y ago

I’m also curious about disambiguation.

I guess these topics are related because if there was a consistent pattern to follow for how to title an article about a war vs about a movie, it would solve the problem.

I was thinking if you could title the page “Stalingrad” and the schema could clarify if it is the battle, the city, a movie title etc