Replying to Avatar Brooks Modesitt

nostr:npub1elwpzsul8d9k4tgxqdjuzxp0wa94ysr4zu9xeudrcxe2h3sazqkq5mehan As someone who became very bullish on decentralized DNS alternatives a couple of years back, I was wondering if you had any thoughts on the current state of those solutions. Obviously in order for these alternatives to become widespread, large ISPs and/or browser makers will need to resolve them. Do you see any current solutions being accepted, or something new entirely?

It’s a mixed bag.

ENS has a lot of traction within the Ethereum community - but nothing that bridges the gap to legacy DNS.

Handshake is a shitshow - because it’s all mainly just speculation around scooping up TLDs

Ziliqua I don’t know but seems like ETH, relevant within its own ecosystem

Unstoppable is just a variation of the legacy ICANN style “register your name in these TLDs before somebody else does” grift.

Stacks has promise except for the infighting and that they’re a side chain to an ecosystem that dismisses them as shitcoiners.

There is no naming initiative on Bitcoin that has any momentum, although I believe ordinals provides a pathway to it, but anybody who suggests that will be tarred and feathered.

Such is the state of decentralized naming today.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.