I think they mean that eventually, the like-mindedness is tested and a bifurcation always occurs. The two groups have to exist together in some manner that does not recognize the previously held like-mindedness... The people who think like this believe their current system of court rules, so-called Law, and other accumulated anomalies that they call the Justice system is some Holy Grail that can never be replicated and is always growing and changing on it's own, at their behest and profit of course. The even have fanatical overtones to their Religion of "justice". It's insane and irrational and they want you in it!

I completely agree with you on the simplicity of agreeing on the basics like the "no pro-murder", but knowledge and opinions are fractal. There will always be someone who has a complicated take on killing the murderer and there will be people that agree. The same for theft. Is theft the same as stealing? That is a whole other debate. What about the stealing food to avoid starvation or the latest hunger pang?

Qualia flavors EVERYTHING and obliterates like-mindedness. If we could live with our hearts, then yes. But we live in a material world and we use our brains to do it. Logic and reason divide the mind. The heart suffers for it.

You have piqued my curiosity on this Lander, Wyoming thing. Is the Prairie Republic dot net website, the current embodiment of the movement? I was fascinated by the Free State Project. Now I've got some more research to do. Thank you!