What about the problem that a network with very small hashpower becomes an easy target for government attacks?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Why should hashrate ever decrease, though? ASIC can be liquidated cheaper and cheaper until it's profitable to plug them again.

A government can then buy a bunch of cheap ASICs and destroy Bitcoin?

No

Yes. Or you, or anyone else.

Andreas destroyed that argument in two minutes.

https://cdn.nostr.build/p/nb11636.mp4

I miss Andreas 🫶🏾

He should be here.

Yeah

On the short term (2 weeks). The difficulty adjustment will increase and the attacker should employ more capital and more power until it reach its objective or the attack becomes prohibiting costly.

No concern about that scenario.

The 51 % attack is also related how colluded the mining entities are; here again, is the decentralization of mining entities which brings solution to the situation.

By the way, these numbers give me evidence, there is participation in mining operation which could survive the coming halving. So no rush on this fee and mining topic addressed by @fiatfaj

web.public-pool.io/#/

These are too high, and they have to be cut to the Bone..⚖️👮‍♂️😠

Fees are too high, and have to be cut to the Bone. Dang autocorrect..🖕

If the total miner reward per block is $10 how much hashpower do you think you will get?