Is their aim regime change do you think?
Discussion
Yes, I believe so.
Even Bibi recently said “we’re clearing the way for the Iranian people to rise and take down the Mullahs.”
In my opinion, eliminating the Mullah regime and dismantling the Shia militant network they fund is the only path to lasting peace in the Middle East.
It started with Assad and Nasrallah—now it’s Tehran’s turn.
Judging by the regime change that took place in Syria, I'm skeptical.
The only real parallel with Syria is the shared fact that a Shia ruling class backed by Iran must go.
Beyond that, the alternatives are culturally and historically different.
Khomeini ended 2,500 years of monarchy in Iran nearly 50 years ago—but that legacy still resonates.
There’s a real chance that the Iranian crown prince could return in some form of leadership.
Just thoughts, of course—it’s all uncertain. But the fall of this regime could reset the entire region.
Al Jolanni (sorry can't spell his name) isn't anyones idea of civilised I shouldn't think.
Totally agree — figures like Al-Julani aren’t anyone’s idea of progress or civilization.
But Iran’s case is fundamentally different.
The opposition isn’t made up of jihadist warlords. It’s largely secular, educated, and deeply rooted in modern civil values.
The diaspora includes human rights advocates, constitutional monarchists, liberal reformists, exiled intellectuals, and even former regime insiders who’ve broken away.
It’s not a perfect bloc, but it’s remarkably civilized by any global standard—and worlds apart from the chaos that followed regime change in Syria or Libya.
Of course, no change is without risk—but clinging to a brutal theocracy because the alternative isn’t perfectly mapped out is just another form of paralysis.
Interesting insight ty