Replying to Avatar idsera

Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BI2FuoyhfXE from nostr:npub1cxyr9w0dwkjxs7svmwjlg4veqp9uzw0qvwux0c0554lqzw5ut48qrahz6x

If Spark stablecoin payments gain traction, will routing fees for Lightning node operators match those from Taproot Asset transactions or standard Lightning payments, or is the fee model fundamentally different?

May be a dumb question but something I was thinking about.

nostr:nprofile1qqswyru28qavtc2nvcgpc9sgae8n875t94uj2r8t9ddg4w4y899xulqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgqg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0tk65rn nostr:npub1cxyr9w0dwkjxs7svmwjlg4veqp9uzw0qvwux0c0554lqzw5ut48qrahz6x

nostr:nevent1qqsp7xuqw23ur2xdqjenuua2shnp9fd0nwuqyyjg948d8zzcma7789cpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhg9yxt3a

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Appreciate it!

Good question! I believe Taproot Assets would result in more revenue for LN nodes because 100% of payments would go over the LN whereas with Spark intra-Spark (entity) payments will not go over the LN. This assumes similar level of volume for both TA and Spark.

That makes sense. Thanks for the reply and appreciate the work you do!