Of course it is, I should know my place and not question the mighty Core Devs.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No. Please question Core devs. Constantly review and check them.

But you should actually know what youโ€™re talking about. Which you (and every caught up in Luke/Mechanicโ€™s crusade) donโ€™t.

A huge signal you are also missing is that people (the market) doesn't want this spam on chain or they would be using ALTs like ETH and Solana where it has "utility".

Therefore the QED anger at Bitcoin Devs for helping facilitate this garbage.

Core devs arenโ€™t โ€œfacilitating this garbage.โ€

Itโ€™s very simple. You cannot accurately predict the next block if youโ€™re deliberately ignoring certain transactions. This is very bad for fee estimation, mining centralization, and other aspects of the ecosystem.

You, like most of the people on this stupid crusade, havenโ€™t seriously thought through the ramifications of what you support (or even if itโ€™s even effective), because itโ€™s really all about virtue signaling that youโ€™re a โ€œpureโ€ maxi.

They are, with the spam filters removed, more spam can be built on Bitcoin like rollups.

Where are the proposals from Core to make spam harder? Oh they can't be bothered with that bcos they own companies that spam on Bitcoin.

Wake the fuck up.