Cause then they wouldn’t make any money. Low time preference free option ftw.
nostr:npub1cn4t4cd78nm900qc2hhqte5aa8c9njm6qkfzw95tszufwcwtcnsq7g3vle why Strike withdrawal fees aren’t matching with the mempool and much more higher ? 
nostr:note1fujfyex2xtckvqdefqjvnjtd8jfmxqm6mtjusyuhzw57yaduvvwqr40h2t
Discussion
How about this one ? 
Just select No Fee 😎
I want this UTXO in the next block
You can send via lightning to Muun and then send it to cold storage from there
Same thing. Gamification to make more money. Strike gonna be out of business if they don’t make money.
Here is the nostr:npub1cashappn03s3cl2ljsdntv0v28e2um5lgx4vjctqjt23pcwzjhsqmtdg5l example ! Seems like fair and still in business. I guess River also does the same as cashapp following the network fees model 
High time preference withdrawals subsidizing the low time preference withdrawals
Should be more transparent then. Why wouldn’t you just tight it to the mempool if you do onchain withdrawal without “subsiding model” I mean if I need this transaction in the next block and onchain I don’t want to over pay to subsidize those who waiting for “free”withdrawal
I’m just speculating. Makes sense to me.