Imagine for a second if millions of years of evolution were not wasted poorly, and the human brain is actually a Pareto-frontier of efficiency-generality of intelligence. And even in principle, we can only approach it with AI, never surpass it. If this is the case AI would never be able to truly replace humans and it would be always more financially meaningful to build specialist AIs that enhance humans, rather than trying to replace them completely. One good ending that is not that improbable.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yep. Millions of years of evolution is a hell of a lot of work done & efficiency gains. Imagine an AI you could power for a day with a few bananas and some water. 🤯