I think really the point I’m trying to make is if you’re dealing with a centralized authority and they WANT you as the person of interest? There is no such thing as plausible deniability.
Discussion
This is exactly my point. There is plausible deniability unless there isn’t. Your approach to this is well, it’s difficult so let’s assume it’s impossible and somehow therefore unimportant. Difficult does not in any way equal unimportant. Stick to principals in all things. A principled person dies with fewer assets and regrets than a treacherous one. I’ll always be the one to sacrifice a few dollars for a clear conscience, or some difficult work for a truly tenable solution.
There’s no such thing when you’re trying to make change as a unimportant perspective.
Sorry to have wasted your time.
I don’t consider any of these discussions to be a waste of time. I didn’t mean to insult you, if I did then you have my sincere apologies.
It’s not insulting and my feelings don’t matter; it’s just surprising how often people say things like “let’s discuss!” And someone will offer a line of thinking that doesn’t quite perfectly fit in the way others think and they refuse to use or engage with it like they would/do others more traditional views.
Nothing wrong with that; I just find it strange. And that’s on me so I apologize if you feel somehow less or inadequate.