Replying to Avatar Ava

nostr:nevent1qqs9ruq84z06hvsdm3lcwwxtygg0d8pu0xayvqagpkl6wha07x7rpkqpr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmqzypkqayqkh8q7lelda7r72p0z58srmv0mhn7u8mttf7925j65ptvc7qcyqqqqqqg8cz5rg

great question. it depends on your threat model. proton doesn't even recommend itself if you are the next edward snowden. email is not the most secure medium of communication https://proton.me/blog/protonmail-threat-model

but imo it's great for most people. i both use and recommend it...especially for custom domains, unlimited access to #simplelogin and a mobile vpn with splittunneling on android.

that said, it's not best infosec/opsec to keep all of your eggs in one basket. i still use and recommend bitwarden and keepass over proton pass and i'd be keen to use #mullvad vpn more if it offered splittunneling etc

Just choose the operator which gives you a chance to control your e-mail in the way you want to for free e.g.

-pop3 or imap

-using pgp/gpg - your keys with password

-autocrypt or not (delta.chat)

As Asa said, don't put all eggs to one basket. Protonmail creates another walled garden.

Remember, ca.20 years ago Gmail was perceived as a fency email. People paid to have one.

Currently Gmail refuses some people possibility log in even if they have password. You have no option to challenge this.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.