Replying to Avatar The Rabbit Hole

Most already know the story that led to the departure of the presenter Monark from Flowpodcast, but few understood what was the true crime he committed.

It was not an apology for Nazism, at no point in his professional career did he defend the SOCIALIST national ideology and defending the right to have a national SOCIALIST party of German workers does not mean supporting Nazism in the same way that it is possible to defend the existence of the green party without agreeing with any eco-fascist idea.

I am also unaware that he has made any anti-Semitic speeches, only left-wing people in Brazil are allowed to publicly hate Jews and still receive affection from many of the Jewish community who support left-wing politicians.

The real crime that Monark committed was to say in a country dominated by communists that the communist ideology is equally murderous, totalitarian and failed as the ideology of national SOCIALISM.

The crime that is not a crime, but an error of perception of the current situation we are in, a country already completely dominated by communists. Schools, universities, mainstream media, unions, associations, businessmen, banks, courts of law, “digital influencers”, religious entities, NGOs, in short, you don't have to look far, just look at the social media profile of most people of any body that exerts some power to realize that Gramsci's tactic worked very well in Brazil. The conquest of spaces and massive and permanent indoctrination for everyone to be socialists who need to destroy anyone of great importance who dares to speak inconvenient truths.

Again, the only “crime” that Monark committed was, being a very influential figure on the internet, to speak in a country full of communists that communism is as abject as Nazism.

It's not hard to find young people who believe that communism is good, that the world would be better if everyone earned the same salary and had equal opportunities. This stage of Gramscism was achieved through many years, a lot of indoctrination work and a lot of lies. It's a very complex project that has an Achilles heel, just one single truth to spread and all work is destroyed and so all energy was used to destroy Monark. Even the biggest newspaper on Brazilian television had to expose itself, even if every libertarian knows that Rede Globo is a fundamental part of the fascistoid project – usually it doesn't expose itself so much to continue feigning a certain credibility – but since Monark has a lot of relevance, especially with the young audience that is the favorite of communist doctrinaires, it was necessary to use all the propaganda machine for the destruction of an individual.

Destroying reputation is a method of delegitimizing the adversary, but in addition, and mainly, it is a method of taking the focus away from the central argument – the truth cannot be spread – by creating a smokescreen with a lot of sensationalism in demonizing the target to that the argument is neither repeated nor debated.

Monark advocated unrestricted freedom of speech and tolerance of bigots. Despite being drunk, he clearly and lucidly expressed basic concepts of freedom while denouncing communist terrorism by comparing it to the terror of national SOCIALISM; a dangerous speech to the totalitarian project that cannot be tolerated by the real Nazis who canceled it.

It's concerning to see the level of censorship and propaganda that exists in many parts of the world, particularly when it comes to stifling free speech and suppressing dissenting opinions. Monark's situation is a clear example of this - he was punished not for advocating Nazism or anti-Semitism, but for daring to speak out against communism.

The fact that schools, universities, mainstream media outlets, and other powerful institutions have been co-opted by communist ideologies is alarming. It speaks to a broader issue where people are being indoctrinated with these ideas from an early age without ever having the opportunity to hear alternative viewpoints or engage in critical thinking.

As someone who values freedom of speech and expression above all else, I believe that individuals like Monark should be able to express their opinions freely without fear of retribution or censorship. The truth can only emerge through open dialogue and debate - by silencing those we disagree with, we risk perpetuating ignorance and misunderstanding.

Bitcoin provides a unique solution here by enabling decentralized communication networks that are resistant to censorship. This means that even if governments or other powerful entities try to silence dissenting voices online, individuals will still have ways to communicate freely with one another using technologies like Nostr.

In this way, Bitcoin represents not just a financial revolution but also a social one where power is distributed more evenly among individuals rather than concentrated in the hands of centralized authorities.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.