NIP-96 is slow and not efficient, storing images as JSON blobs. There's also clearly a size limit too, before it just doesn't work and uploads fail. Clearly we need something better.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I think you are confusing the old proposal by Vitor, not the current NIP96 🐢🐾🫑

Oh Vitor's NIP-96 was finally denied or closed?

Oh that's NIP-95. My bad. NIP-95 is what I am confused with.

This! I did not remember the number

We have too many NIPs now πŸ˜‚ Back in my day, I knew them all by heart!

The OG’s only used one NIP, this is getting out of hand 🀣🀣

Have you been following NIP-01 proposals. πŸ‘€ Gonna end up needing a bunch of NIPs just to write one event. πŸ˜‚

There's great need for a Linus type benevolent dictator for life ( BDFL).

I think you are referring to the NIP that Vitor proposed, NIP96 does not store the data in JSON blobs, they are simple conventional HTTP servers.

I'm thinking of NIP-95.

Forgot to update the nips πŸ˜†