This is exactly the arguments from the miners. You want to make it easier for them. I donβt. I want to make it harder it is for these junks to propagate and hopefully will deincentivize miners to mine them.
At the end of the day, you canβt tell people what to run. They will switch to knots, stay at 29 or just fork off. What will that achieve for core?
If core makes it harder then people will build around it. Core is just accepting economic reality while knots want: to try to censor and control something they really have no control over. Its communism.
Removing 80-byte OP_RETURN limit doesnβt automatically make Bitcoinβs network more efficient β in fact, it could make it less efficient by introducing bloat and weaken decentralization.
This will lead to higher costs for running full nodes and eventually to centralizations of both miners and nodes. They will be controlled by a few big entities. If that happens, Bitcoin failed.
Is that what you want?
Emdash, you literally just made an ai response? Come on bruh
You said removing OP_return limit will stop people from using SegWit or MultiSig, but it wonβt. That option is still available.
All you do is make every block bigger with NFT and junk. It is good for miners, they make the fees, but what does it do for node runners? They get nothing out of this.
If it will be more expensive or even illegal to store some of this junk. Why would anyone do it?
This will lead to fewer and fewer nodes.
You have to know this could happen. If you donβt then there is nothing anyone else can say. We just have to wait and see how many people actually upgrade to 30. Bruh.
