Replying to Avatar ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ

well, people should stop being scared of terminals because $3/month is all it costs, plus a few hours reading and working

the absurd endless drama of ipv6 is probably never going to end because tptb don't really want us to be able to do full internet wide p2p so WG is a way to skate right past that and do it anyway
Avatar
Dimi 1y ago

I will simply never use IPv6. I plan to buy a subnet this year.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago

buy a whole subnet? i presume you mean 256 addresses?

i agree though, IPV4 is actually addressable to 48 bits which is a huge amount, just requires some coordination at a p2p level

i *can* use ipv6 if i want to but it's just pointless if i want to work with p2p systems, because almost nobody has p2p running on ipv6!

Avatar
Dimi 1y ago

Ya, /24 is all I can justify. Plenty to start with

Avatar
Daniel Wigton 1y ago

Is there a reason ipv6 isn't used for p2p? I assumed it would be easier.